Comment on this Article

Can We Give Fish a Chance?

Posted on August 10, 2009
by WorldChanging - Premier Partner SustainLane Premier Content Partners are part of a growing network of publishers bringing you the very best green content from across the web.

To read more articles by this Premier Partner, follow the link at the end of this post.

Will the oceans run out of edible fish in our lifetimes? Maybe not, according to a new study.

In 2006, a team of scientists led by Boris Worm in Halifax, Nova Scotia, made an alarming prediction: Overfishing was causing saltwater fish populations to collapse at such a rate that we could see the end of seafood by the year 2048. Because more than one billion people worldwide rely on seafood as a primary source of protein, and about 43.5 million people worldwide work in the fishing and seafood industries, this was a potential global food and economic crisis in the making.

Now, a collaborative effort on behalf of scientists on two sides of the issue -- both marine ecologists, who work for conservation, and fisheries management scientists, who work to find a way to safely harvest natural resources from the sea -- has shown that the prediction is a worst-case scenario and not a given. By taking action now, we can ensure a future for fish populations. According to an article in last Thursday's New York Times:

In the end, the scientists concluded that 63 percent of saltwater fish stocks had been depleted “below what we think of as a target range,” Dr. Worm said.
But they also agreed that fish in well-managed areas, including the United States, were recovering or doing well. They wrote that management techniques like closing some areas to fishing, restricting the use of certain fishing gear or allocating shares of the catch to individual fishermen, communities or others could allow depleted fish stocks to rebound.
The researchers suggest that a calculation of how many fish in a given species can be caught in a given region without threatening the stock, called maximum sustainable yield, is less useful than a standard that takes into account the health of the wider marine environment. They also agreed that solutions did not lie only in management techniques but also in the political will to apply them, even if they initially caused economic disruption.

Now that we've heard the warning, it's as though we've been given a second chance. Can we create a globally palatable standard for managing the world's fish -- and, more to the point, the world's oceans?

Posted to WorldChanging by Julia Levitt

WorldChanging covers the world's most intelligent solutions to today's problems. Our online magazine and books continue to inspire audiences around the world with stories of important and innovative new tools, models and ideas.

Comments

post commentPost a comment:

Get Started

Write a Review Post to SustainLane Add Green Products & Businesses

Written by WorldChanging

WorldChanging

WorldChanging.com covers the world's most intelligent solutions to today's problems. Our online magazine and books continue to inspire audiences around the world with stories of important and innovative new tools, models and ideas. More About WorldChanging »

Share eco-tips, news, how-tos,
or just blog it.

Post Now!
Advertisement