With the launch of the new Nano, Apple claims to have released the "cleanest" and most "toxic free" iPod yet. However, there is clearly room to improve the device further.
Starting next year, Steve Jobs agreed to create products free of BFR (brominated flame retardants) and PVC (polyvinyl chloride).
The Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition, an advocacy group for clean computer production and disposal, says Apple’s hardware recycling program is inadequate, and that Apple has been lobbying against recycling legislation. They also claim that iPod batteries wear out too quickly, so gadgets are junked too soon.
Maybe it’s better to buy a used device, but do iPods last long enough to make it worth your while? Our advice: don’t count on a device lasting over 2.5 years and weigh your investment accordingly.
While we appreciate any and all strides to clean up their act, Apple can do better to really green their toys.
Jordan P. says:
What kind of batteries do these things use, I bet there is a nasty little bugger in there. Doesn't anybody get songs stuck in their head anymore? Buy a guitar or harmonica. Or God forbid, go without your soundtrack.
:)