Seattle has seen the rise of its music scene, Starbucks proliferate as a worldwide brand and the creation of Bill Gates’ mega-mansion, but it has not seen the development of high speed rail.
Since 1992 there have been plans for an international high speed train line between the US and Canada, but after seventeen years no such line has entered into service. The Pacific Northwest has a good culture of public transportation and seems to be one of the more receptive areas of the country when it comes to improving mass transit. Portland Oregon stands out as having one of the best light rail and bus fleets in the country. Despite this, progress has been painfully slow.
The reason for this is a lack of funding in rail infrastructure. This is a recurring point in the development (or lack thereof) of high speed rail corridors. Since World War II the US government has spent $2 trillion into highway and aviation systems while passenger rail has received less than 3% of transportation funding from the federal government. The results are self evident. Passenger rail in the US is in very poor condition, leaving cars and planes the only convenient options available.
Nearly two decades after the Pacific Northwest was designated as a high speed rail corridor, money is finally starting to flow into the project. In November 2008, voters in the State of Washington passed a ballot measure called “Sound Transit 2,” which provided $17.9 billion for transit and commuter rail investment. Much like the bond issue of $10 billion in California in the same year, it is a start but not nearly enough to fund the line.
The Northwest Corridor also must deal with another potential conflict. As it is not among the most populous corridors in the nation, many tracks currently are dedicated to the movement of freight instead of people. Many ports are located in the major cities of this line and there will be issues on who will get the right of way on the tracks. Freight companies in the region, notably Union Pacific and BNSF, are worried about trains going “too fast”.
Freight carriers are in effect imposing a speed limit of 110 mph on trains that share tracks with them. This is not true high speed rail and exactly half of the velocity planned in California. Andrew Johnsen, assistant vice president for state government affairs at BNSF has said, “You really need to have separate tracks. Whether you need to have separate right of way is a question we can discuss.”
New tracks across the Pacific Northwest to attain high speed rail might be the only way to realize the project. For that, investment is needed.
Posted to CleanTechies by alex
CleanTechies is a career site & business network for the CleanTech community. It focuses on renewable energy, resource efficiency, green building, and sustainable transportation. CleanTechies provides Professional Resume Writing Services targeting green jobs.
Elli A. says:
Yep, Obama's idea of reducing carbon emissions is cars. Spending billions on bailing out failed businesses instead of building the correct transportation infrastructure: Transportation without cars. Same thing in California. Lots of talk and no money in sight.