What's a Sustainable City, Anyway?

What's a Sustainable City, Anyway?

Back in 2004, the news emerged that two-thirds of the world's population might be living in cities by 2030. At SustainLane, we got curious about what cities were doing to handle that growth, and we began taking a closer look into the sustainability initiatives taking hold: Which cities were planning for the future, and which were painfully unprepared?

In that first ranking, released in spring 2005, we found that San Francisco came out on top, with Portland and Seattle not far behind. We learned that West Coast cities and "blue" cities (New York, Chicago, Boston) seemed to be greener than "red" ones. We chalked that up, in part, to the notion that modern sustainability grew out of 1970s environmentalism -- often the domain of Democrats, while Republicans saw environmentalism as anti-economic growth back then.

That's less the case nowadays, given the connection that folks are increasingly drawing between sustainability initiatives and quality of life. Plenty of Middle American and red cities have made the list, from Jacksonville to Milwaukee, and we know from looking over the data for the 2008 rankings that even more are on the move. We look forward to seeing more cities score higher, and we expect an increasing pace of innovation adoption across the board.

Meanwhile, here's a closer look at the categories we use. (See here for a thorough explanation of our methodology)

Transit: What options do you have?

Leadership in affordable and convenient public transit will pay dividends for a city, having positive impacts on childhood asthma rates, traffic congestion and associated stress, fuel consumption, and greenhouse gases. Since transit operations require multi-year -- if not multi-generational -- investments, strong leadership is required to push through needed upgrades nationwide, like bringing light-rail into our densely populated regions.

Energy Use: How sustainable are your energy options? Does your city have a co-generation plan? Wind or solar sources?

With the multi-trillion-dollar global energy prize going to the new technologies of wind, wave, solar, geothermal, and other renewables, this is a very exciting area of sustainability. We'll see the decentralization of our energy supplies over the next 20 years, with home-mounted wind and solar arrays powering neighborhoods where local, state, and federal regulators put in place incentives to drive adoption for the common good.

Water Quality and Usage: Does your water come from a renewable source and, um, can you drink it?

Yikes! How could you miss the recent news on pharmaceuticals in our water supply? Fluoride, heavy metals, bacteria ... it's enough to drive you to drink. We're seeing the results of 100 years of industrial and agricultural practices, and the residues of those practices in our water table, rivers, and lakes. We must invest in the rehabilitation of our water supplies, as Chicago is doing with Lake Michigan. We must also consider catchment in water-parched locations like Los Angeles, where such processes could provide 50 percent of the region's water supply. In the meantime, buy a home water filter for your family's health if you can, and try to be more conscious of how you use water. It's more precious than oil.

Air Quality: How well can you breathe?

Cities like Chicago still struggle to control the belching smokestacks of the nearby industrial centers. Coal-fired power plants -- with their outputs of mercury and CO2, among other nasties -- still produce 53 percent of the nation's power. Cars, trucks, ships, and trains ... the means with which we move our food, goods, materials, and people are at the root of dirty air. And it seems to be getting worse. Yet we see progress with clean-air vehicles, and forward-looking policies to move away from liquid fuels, such as in Austin, where they are considering all-electric transport powered by renewables.

Green Building:

How many green real estate projects are planned or built in your city?

These construction projects cost 10 to 15 percent more than conventional development, but with their lower energy usage, reduced water consumption, and daylighting and airflow that provide for greater health and well-being of occupants, it's a great investment with a three-year payback cycle. When you add in leadership from government agencies for green-lighting building permits and saved fees, it's easy to see why places like Atlanta and Portland are teeming with LEED-certified projects.

Traffic Congestion:

How much bumper-to-bumper action is in your town?

Road rage, wasted time, needless expense on fuel, vehicle trips, and road maintenance: none is routinely measured when a city is evaluating congestion projects. Citizens must take responsibility here and reduce the time they spend in cars. Every city in the country battles with this, and as we saw from Mayor Bloomberg's failed attempt at taxing vehicles entering lower Manhattan at peak times, we don't like to be told not to drive our cherished autos.

Land Use:

Do you have access to parks? Does development happen on untrammeled land or in "recycled" places?

It's not surprising that green cities should have lots of green space -- an urban forest acts as a natural air filter, for one thing, and the closer you are to nature, the less you have to drive or take other transportation to get to it. But a sustainable city should also be thinking about growth boundaries, trying to concentrate development, compact infrastructure, complete urban infill projects -- in other words, building in those forgotten or dilapidated pockets inside city limits.

Housing Availability and Affordability:

Can your grandkids live there, too?

Most people don't realize that affordable housing is a tenet of green cities, but think about it: Sustainability implies activity today is still plausible in the next generations. Diversity, a hallmark of a thriving city center, is being squashed in great cities like San Francisco, where sky-high housing prices are creating a deeply segregated population based on economic means. Your grandkids should be able to afford to live in your neighborhood, too, and live close to jobs, services, green space (which many people want these days, causing prices to soar) -- all that requires a mix of housing types and prices. Some cities have an overstock of affordable housing due to the economic doldrums, like Cleveland. But even that city with too few tenants has taken initiatives to create new, affordable housing, and to make it enticing to potential buyers.

Government initiatives:

What are your leaders doing to make sure your city becomes a greener, healthier, happier place?

It's all about leadership. We need our leaders to step up and show strength in putting together long-term plans that favor sustainable development. We also need citizen leadership to rally communities and foster greater teamwork in the march toward the future. Together, we can change how and where we live.

James Elsen is the founder and CEO of SustainLane. He is currently working on adapting the U.S. City Sustainability Rankings for New Zealand, Japan, and the U.K.

post commentPost a comment:

Comments (5)

Nancy J.
9/30/2008 11:54 am

Nancy J. says:

Hi James,

This is a wonderful service you and SustainLane are doing. I've been following your work for the past six months or so and am thrilled to finally see the 2008 rankings.

Realizing this research is an incredible effort, I understand why the rankings may only include the top 50 largest cities in the U.S. However, I'm wondering if your team will be able to expand your manpower (and funding) to open up the rankings to more cities in future surveys (I see you're adapting the survey for New Zealand, etc.).

Thank you very much.

Sincerely,

Nancy JonesFrancis
Grand Rapids, Michigan

James E.
9/30/2008 6:35 pm

James E. says:

Hi Nancy, thanks for the kind words. This is our third Rankings, and yes, we plan to do more. We are looking at extending both internationally, as well as to smaller US cities. We continue to roll feedback into our model, and the surveys we do with cities become more thorough each year. It's a lot of fun to do too. We've seen such huge improvements across the board since we started looking into sustainability practices at the local level - it has been very exciting to report on!

Thanks for being part of the community,

James

Nancy J.
9/30/2008 7:01 pm

Nancy J. says:

Hi James,

Thank you for your immediate response and with answers I was hoping to receive.

My best to you all.

Nancy

Amanda D.
10/8/2008 8:28 am

Amanda D. says:

Hi James,

This is a great resource! I was wondering if there were any plans to rank the other end of the spectrum...the 50 least-sustainable cities? I know it's not as positive as celebrating the top 50, but it would be helpful to know where more resources need to be focused in order to create even more sustainable cities across our country. Thanks!

Amanda
San Antonio, TX

James E.
10/8/2008 4:00 pm

James E. says:

Hi Amanda,

Well, we ranked the 50 largest cities, from most sustainable to least sustainable. We don't actually seek out the most sustainable, or least sustainable cities, we include cities based on size, from largest on down, and then we come up with this ranking. One ranking we are considering doing though is smaller cities...like Burlington, VT., or Boulder, CO. It is quite often the case that smaller cities are even more innovative than larger cities when it comes to creating sustainability programs. If you can imagine NYC tinkering with their waste programs, and something goes wrong...yikes! But smaller cities can try things out and there's not as much of a downside...they can take on greater risks, and some do. But that also makes for some interesting stories of major successes too! Stay tuned...if you're registered for our newsletter, we'll keep you posted, and thanks for stopping by!

Get Started

Write a Review Post to SustainLane Add Green Products & Businesses
Advertisement

Sign up for updates

US City Rankings, next edition!

Find local green businesses near you.

community-powered to help you live green.